Minimal recognition. The respondents have not shown a foundation for the conclusion that allowing same-sex marriage will cause the harmful outcomes they describe. When either spouse has children, or a dependent spouse from a prior marriage, obligations for past and future family support can be complex.
New York Times. On February 11,the Idaho House of Representativesby a 53 to 17 vote, approved a constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage and its "legal equivalent" in id same sex marriage in Concord state. The law still refers to father and mother.
New York Times. Limited to residency rights for foreign spouses of EU citizens. In addition the highest courts of many States have contributed to this ongoing dialogue in decisions interpreting their own State Constitutions. The limitation of marriage to opposite-sex couples may long have seemed natural and just, but its inconsistency with the central meaning of the id same sex marriage in Concord right to marry is now manifest.
Baird, U. The Constitution grants them that right. DeKoe, who served this Nation to preserve the freedom the Constitution protects, must endure a substantial burden.
See Brief for American Psychological Association et al. And, were tragedy to befall either DeBoer or Rowse, the other would have no legal rights over the children she had not been permitted to adopt. See Loving U.
Retrieved January 10, LGBT portal. Were the Court to stay its hand to allow slower, case-by-case determination of the required availability of specific public benefits to same-sex couples, it still would deny gays and lesbians many rights and responsibilities intertwined with marriage.
These state and federal judicial opinions are cited in Appendix A, infra.