We are agnostic on the issue because there is no moral objectivity that can settle the issue. Kimmel It affords same-sex couple legal stature and recognition in a very homophobic atmosphere.
Religions should be free to define and sanction marriage as they deem proper for their practitioners. It is for these reasons that we beg to propose. The sad truth is, many people choose the second, to the harm of themselves, their future spouses, their children and all those who care about their happiness.
The right to marry is fundamental but the right to marry someone of the same sex is not. They should not — we assume prop to be saying here — ignore what most people think.
We have contended that same-sex marriage has no social ill that spreads to the individual who wish to believe that same-sex marriage is wrong other than perhaps discomfort, and we have established that discomfort at a government policy is not basis enough to reject that government policy.
Same-sex marriage has fuelled, rather than stemmed, these homophobic patterns. I think that it should be legal, as it is basic human rights for a person to love whoever they want to love, whatever their gender may be. Popular Same sex marriage debate script sample in Essex Pew Research U.
They cannot fight it, they cannot avoid it or ignore it, and it they try to take their right, they are criminals.
On Point Value this story? The higher price you pay is being forced to give up your dreams of a family. All modern democracies exhibit majoritarianism. Finally, while we concede that ideologically driven legislators will often find ways in which to manipulate legislation to damage the interests of others, we feel we should consider the issue realistically.